amathela: (Default)
Be cool, Gail. Be cool. ([personal profile] amathela) wrote2007-05-20 08:36 am
Entry tags:

No wonder time travel is so confusing

Oh, television writers, why do you forsake me?

Seriously, how hard can it be to sit down and plan a timeline before you start writing? I do it with my fics, and - dare I say it - that's only fanfiction. It's posted online for a dozen people to read, and I make no money off it whatsoever. But, come on. You guys are professionals. It's your job.

I'm used to occasional, even glaring, inconsistencies in a show's timeline (when was Shelly Pomroy's party, again?). But that doesn't excuse it. In a show that doesn't rely heavily on its timeline, it's easy to overlook - which is not to say it isn't important. In a show that spans a shorter period than a regular series - five, seven, eight weeks instead of the usual nine months to a year - it's even more so. And in a show that features time travel as a prominent and important plot device? Dude. Put some fucking forethought into it.

In episode 1:1 - Genesis, Claire states that homecoming (episode 1:9 - Homecoming) is in exactly three weeks. In episode 1:2 - Don't Look Back, it's October 2nd. Episode 1:4 - Collision, we'll later learn, takes place on October 4th.

It's also stated that Don't Look Back takes place the day after Genesis - which would place homecoming on October 22nd. By episode 1:11 - Fallout, two weeks have passed since then, and it's remarked that Nathan's election (which we already know to be held on November 7th, the day before the explosion) is in three weeks.

Only it's not. Because the current timeline would place Fallout around November 5th, just two days before the election. To make sense, Fallout should actually occur on October 17th, placing homecoming on October 3rd - which is before Collision, and all kinds of impossible.

And then, of course, there's Claire. In Collision, the coroner assumes her age at sixteen. Okay, I can live with an approximation. At various points throughout the series, it's stated that Claire is "nearly sixteen" (by Claire), that she is sixteen (by Meredith), that she's a junior (by Sandra), and that on February 28th, 1992 (the date of the article concerning the fire in which she and Meredith were presumed to have died, and fourteen years and eight months before the current timeline), she was eighteen months old. It's possible to reconcile all those things (if you squint a little), but it isn't readily apparent. And in a show about a group of people with superpowers saving the world, I really don't think that that's where you want all my efforts at maintaining my suspension of disbelief going.

I know that even professional writers make mistakes. Believe me, I've got used it. But if you have a timeline of less than two months to work with, really, how hard is it to say that it begins here, ends there, that key events take place then, then, and then, and let the rest fall in the middle? And, for God's sake, either figure out how old your characters are, or stop freaking mentioning it.

[identity profile] talumin.livejournal.com 2007-05-20 02:52 am (UTC)(link)
They really need a better continuity editor on that show. You didn't get this sorta thing in Buffy, no-siree-bob.
ext_7442: (Default)

[identity profile] amathela.livejournal.com 2007-05-20 03:06 am (UTC)(link)
Honestly, I don't think an editor's going to do it. Within the first two episodes, you have the beginning and end of the season - October 2nd and November 8th respectively - mapped out, and you have a timeline of three weeks from the first episode to the ninth, leaving only two weeks to get from the ninth episode to the twenty-second. So I can totally understand why later episodes contradict that timeline; in my opinion, it isn't the later continuity lapse that's the problem, but their original timeline. After that, you can go one of three ways: employ some of that neat space-time continuum bending and go back and actually plan this stuff in advance, stick to the original timeline and end up with something that sucks because you were forced to rush it, or ignore continuity and just do whatever the hell you want and hope nobody cares too much, which is what they seem to have done. And honestly, I don't care too much, but time is such a big theme/plot throughout the series that I just wish they'd sat down and planned it all properly from the beginning.

(And honestly? The shows that I love now, I love them, but man do they have some bad continuity. I honestly don't remember anything on Buffy being this blatantly erroneous, and I can't believe that it actually seems wrong now, somehow, for a show not to have massive continuity errors. Man, I miss the days when the continuity editor's job was something other than, seemingly, editing out anything that might be mistaken for coninuity.)

[identity profile] talumin.livejournal.com 2007-05-20 03:08 am (UTC)(link)
That was like a mini-rant all by itself. I can only assume that writers are forced to change things mid-season and hope people don't notice.

PS. I have a Hufflepuff lighter too now.
ext_7442: (Default)

[identity profile] amathela.livejournal.com 2007-05-20 03:15 am (UTC)(link)
Yeah, I might have got a little carried away >.> And I'll (more or less) happily ignore even glaring continuity errors (particularly in fanfic, when I can choose to exploit them to create my own most favourable timeline ;)), but that doesn't mean I waive my right to complain about them :P

PS: Copycat :P My Hufflepuff lighter is the original and the best. But it's a Puff lighter, so it's totally happy for you.